Opening night review of The Myth of Escape by guest blogger Laura Maley who joined us on day four of rehearsals.
On the anniversary of the 7/7 London bombings and the day which saw a phone hacking
scandal bring the closure of the News of the World, I found it quite appropriate to see The Myth of Escape and take from it themes of reality, trust and truth, personal and political freedom and power and control.
Having seen most of acts 2 and 3 in early rehearsals, I didn’t know what happened at the very end of the play – or even how the story began.
Act 1 was all new territory for me, but it is brilliantly and darkly funny – I hadn’t expected to be made to think as much as I was made to laugh. Billy’s bizarre story about a dog and
what it prompts him to do will make you choke laughing, as well as question his sanity. I was really surprised by what happens in act 1, and how it fits with acts 2 and 3. I certainly wasn’t prepared for Billy’s reason for his crime! Given Alex’s imaginings and meltdown in act 2, I was surprised by his calm self-assuredness during act 1 and his certainty in his strategy to avoid all questions and escape the probing of his interrogators. Chris’s early meeting with Billy was another surprise. Her cold manipulation seemed so calculated when contrasted with her concern for Billy – I wasn’t sure which parts of her personality were ‘real’, she’s quite an automaton, which I had already gathered from rehearsals.
So, what was different from my ‘in-rehearsal’ viewing of acts 2 and 3?
Obvious differences of course include costume and a lack of script-holding. The stage was, I think, maybe shallower than in rehearsal – but with careful plotting of movement and direction, it didn’t feel like I was watching a small stage, or that performances were in any way inhibited.
I thought the storytelling element of Alex’s long monologue (act 3) came across very strongly and was supported in its dramatic unfolding by Billy and Chris being with him and reacting to it as it progressed. There was a real sense of awe and wonder in the details of what he was relaying.
It’s fair to say I’m still not entirely sure how the story began; I still have plenty of unanswered questions about how the characters got to where they are at the beginning. Why’s Alex in prison? Why does Billy return? Are the two men deliberately put in adjacent
cells? Why can they hear each other through thick stone walls? Are the people who judge and punish in a society really fit to be doing that? But I think that audience members will each have their own interpretations, which is just one reason why The Myth of Escape is so interesting.
4 stars – Laura Maley for Cultural Shenanigans.